anti tgn46 polyclonal antibody (Bio-Rad)
Structured Review
Anti Tgn46 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 755 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+tgn46+polyclonal+antibody/Sheep+anti+Human+TGN46/pmc13023029-102-23-28
Average 96 stars, based on 755 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
Staining:Article Title: The Open Reading Frame 7b of the SARS-CoV-2 Disperse Trans-Golgi and Activate the NLRP3 Inflammasome. Article Snippet: Cells were then blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X‐100 (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 40 min at room temperature. .. Cells were stained overnight at 4°C with different primary antibodies: anti‐HA Tag rabbit polyclonal antibody (clone SG77, catalogue 71‐5500, Thermo Fisher; 1:10,000), sheep Article Title: The Open Reading Frame 7b of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Disperse Trans‐Golgi and Activate the NLRP3 Inflammasome Article Snippet: Cells were then blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X‐100 (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 40 min at room temperature. .. Cells were stained overnight at 4°C with different primary antibodies: anti‐HA Tag rabbit polyclonal antibody (clone SG77, catalogue 71‐5500, Thermo Fisher; 1:10,000), sheep |
![( A ) The individual traces of the iFRAP data presented in Fig. are shown. ( B ) Representative traces from A were normalized in two different ways. As presented in ( A ) or they were normalized by total fluorescence to account for bleaching (orange). The curves were qualitatively similar with flat phase followed by an exponential decrease. ( C ) The intensity levels of background (BG; area with no cells), ER and Golgi were measured before and after bleaching in the iFRAP protocol. The bleaching was efficient in the ER while there was little to no change in the Golgi fluorescence (mean ± SD; n > 3). ( D ) VSVG-GFP-RUSH construct localization with Golgi markers (GM130 and <t>TGN46)</t> from the replicate 2 of Fig. . The positions of VSVG-GFP-RUSH and Golgi marker peaks were normalized, setting GM130 as 0 and <t>TGN46</t> as 1. Measurements obtained using line scan analysis (red) are compared with those from the GLIM based automated method (blue) within the same experiment. Each data point represents an individual measurement, with results from both methods shown side-by-side for direct comparison. The relative position of the VSVG-GFP-RUSH construct is plotted at each indicated time point (median ± SE; n is indicated in the figure, n.s = not significant; [Student’s t test]). .](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_8209/pmc12508209/pmc12508209__44319_2025_548_Fig8_ESM.jpg)
